Legislación
US (United States) Code. Title 28. Part I: Organization of courts. Chapter 3: Courts of appeals
-CITE-
28 USC CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-MISC1-
Sec.
41. Number and composition of circuits.
42. Allotment of Supreme Court justices to circuits.
43. Creation and composition of courts.
44. Appointment, tenure, residence and salary of circuit
judges.
45. Chief judges; precedence of judges.
46. Assignment of judges; panels; hearings; quorum.
47. Disqualification of trial judge to hear appeal.
48. Terms of court.
49. Assignment of judges to division to appoint
independent counsels.
AMENDMENTS
1983 - Pub. L. 97-409, Sec. 2(b)(2), Jan. 3, 1983, 96 Stat. 2039,
substituted "independent counsels" for "special prosecutors" in
item 49.
1978 - Pub. L. 95-521, title VI, Sec. 602(b), Oct. 26, 1978, 92
Stat. 1874, added item 49.
Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 5(c), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633,
substituted "panels" for "divisions" in item 46.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 41 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 41. Number and composition of circuits
-STATUTE-
The thirteen judicial circuits of the United States are
constituted as follows:
Circuits Composition
--------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia District of Columbia.
First Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto
Rico, Rhode Island.
Second Connecticut, New York, Vermont.
Third Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virgin
Islands.
Fourth Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina,
Virginia, West Virginia.
Fifth District of the Canal Zone, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Texas.
Sixth Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee.
Seventh Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin.
Eighth Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota.
Ninth Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho,
Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam,
Hawaii.
Tenth Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Utah, Wyoming.
Eleventh Alabama, Florida, Georgia.
Federal All Federal judicial districts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 870; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, Sec.
34, 65 Stat. 723; Pub. L. 96-452, Sec. 2, Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat.
1994; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, Sec. 101, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat.
25.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C. 1940 ed., Sec. 211, and section 864 of
title 48, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Territories and Insular Possessions
(Apr. 12, 1900, ch. 191, Sec. 35, 31 Stat. 85; Mar. 3, 1911, ch.
231, Sec. 116, 36 Stat. 1131; Jan. 28, 1915, ch. 22, Secs. 1, 2, 38
Stat. 803; Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 145, Sec. 42, 39 Stat. 966; Feb. 13,
1925, ch. 229, Secs. 1, 13, 43 Stat. 936, 942; Jan. 31, 1928, ch.
14, Sec. 1, 45 Stat. 54; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 363, Sec. 1, 45 Stat.
1346; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158).
Form of section was simplified.
The District of Columbia was added as a separate circuit. This is
in accord with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United
States which held the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
to be a circuit court of appeals within the Transfer Act of Sept.
14, 1922, ch. 305, 42 Stat. 837, incorporated in the Judicial Code
as Sec. 238(a), but repealed by act Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, Sec.
13, 43 Stat. 942. (See Swift and Co. v. U.S., 1928, 48 S.Ct. 311,
276 U.S. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587.)
In recognizing the District of Columbia as a separate circuit,
the Supreme Court recently used this language: "* * * the eleven
circuits forming the single federal judicature * * *". Comm'r. v.
Bedford's Estate, 65 S.Ct. 1157, at page 1160, 325 U.S. 283, 89
L.Ed. 611.
See section 17 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., providing, "For the
purposes of sections 17-23 of this title, the District of Columbia
shall be deemed to be a judicial circuit * * *", and act Dec. 23,
1944, ch. 724, 58 Stat. 925, which amended section 215 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., incorporated in section 42 of this title. Such
amendment provided that for the purposes of said section 215 "the
District of Columbia shall be deemed to be a judicial circuit."
Many other acts of Congress have recognized the District of
Columbia as a separate circuit. (See the following acts; Aug. 24,
1937, ch. 754, 50 Stat. 751; Feb. 11, 1938, ch. 25, 52 Stat. 28;
Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 433, 53 Stat. 1204; Aug. 7, 1939, ch. 501, 53
Stat. 1223; Dec. 29, 1942, ch. 835, 56 Stat. 1094; May 11, 1944,
ch. 192, 58 Stat. 218; Dec. 23, 1944, ch. 724, 58 Stat. 925.)
See also the following acts recognizing the Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia as a circuit court of appeals: Aug. 15,
1921, ch. 64, 42 Stat. 162; July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 454;
Aug. 24, 1937, ch. 754, 50 Stat. 751; Apr. 6, 1942, ch. 210, 56
Stat. 198; May 9, 1942, ch. 295, 56 Stat. 271. See also Rule 81(d)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In the following cases the Supreme Court of the United States has
recognized the status of the Court of Appeals of the District of
Columbia as a permanent establishment within the federal judicial
system: O'Donoghue v. United States, 1933, 53 S.Ct. 740, 289 U.S.
516, 77 L.Ed. 1356; Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner, 1927, 47
S.Ct. 557, 274 U.S. 145, 71 L.Ed. 972; Claiborne-Annapolis Ferry v.
United States, 1932, 52 S.Ct. 440, 285 U.S. 382, 76 L.Ed. 808;
United States v. California Canneries, 1929, 49 S.Ct. 423, 279 U.S.
553, 73 L.Ed. 838.
Alaska, Canal Zone, and Virgin Islands were added to the 9th,
5th, and 3rd Circuits, respectively, to conform to section 1294 of
this title.
Some of the provisions of section 864 of title 48, U.S.C., 1940
ed., have been retained in said title. For those which were
incorporated in other sections of this revised title, see
Distribution Table.
AMENDMENTS
1982 - Pub. L. 97-164 increased number of judicial circuits from
twelve to thirteen through addition of Federal circuit composed of
all Federal judicial districts.
1980 - Pub. L. 96-452 substituted "twelve" for "eleven" in text
preceding table, substituted "District of the Canal Zone" for
"Alabama, Canal Zone, Florida, Georgia" in item relating to fifth
circuit, and added new item relating to eleventh circuit.
1951 - Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted reference to Guam in that part
relating to composition of Ninth judicial circuit.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section
402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Section 12 of Pub. L. 96-452 provided that: "This Act and the
amendments made by this Act [amending this section and sections 44
and 48 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes
under this section] shall take effect on October 1, 1981."
-TRANS-
TERMINATION OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF THE
CANAL ZONE
For termination of the United States District Court for the
District of the Canal Zone at end of the "transition period", being
the 30-month period beginning Oct. 1, 1979, and ending midnight
Mar. 31, 1982, see Paragraph 5 of Article XI of the Panama Canal
Treaty of 1977 and sections 2101 and 2201 to 2203 of Pub. L. 96-70,
title II, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 493, formerly classified to
sections 3831 and 3841 to 3843, respectively, of Title 22, Foreign
Relations and Intercourse.
-MISC2-
COMMISSION ON STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES FOR THE FEDERAL COURTS OF
APPEALS
Pub. L. 105-119, title III, Sec. 305, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat.
2491, established Commission on Structural Alternatives for the
Federal Courts of Appeals, directed Commission to study division of
United States into judicial circuits, study structure and alignment
of Federal Court of Appeals system, and report to President and
Congress its recommendations of changes needed to expeditiously and
effectively dispose of caseload of Federal Courts of Appeals,
consistent with fundamental concepts of fairness and due process,
provided for Commission's membership and compensation of members
and staff, authorized appropriations, and provided for termination
of Commission 90 days after submission of its report.
ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES AND PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATION OF PENDING
CASES WITH REGARD TO REORGANIZATION OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF
APPEALS
Sections 5 to 10 of Pub. L. 96-452 provided that:
"Sec. 5. Each circuit judge in regular active service of the
former fifth circuit whose official station on the day before the
effective date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981] -
"(1) is in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas is assigned as a
circuit judge of the new fifth circuit; and
"(2) is in Alabama, Florida, or Georgia is assigned as a
circuit judge of the eleventh circuit.
"Sec. 6. Each judge who is a senior judge of the former fifth
circuit on the day before the effective date of this Act [Oct. 1,
1981] may elect to be assigned to the new fifth circuit or to the
eleventh circuit and shall notify the Director of the
Administrative Office of the United States Courts of such election.
"Sec. 7. The seniority of each judge -
"(1) who is assigned under section 5 of this Act; or
"(2) who elects to be assigned under section 6 of this Act;
shall run from the date of commission of such judge as a judge of
the former fifth circuit.
"Sec. 8. The eleventh circuit is authorized to hold terms or
sessions of court at New Orleans, Louisiana, until such time as
adequate facilities for such court are provided in Atlanta,
Georgia.
"Sec. 9. The provisions of the following paragraphs of this
section apply to any case in which, on the day before the effective
date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981], an appeal or other proceeding has
been filed with the former fifth circuit:
"(1) If the matter has been submitted for decision, further
proceedings in respect of the matter shall be had in the same
manner and with the same effect as if this Act [amending sections
41, 44, and 48 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as
notes under this section] had not been enacted.
"(2) If the matter has not been submitted for decision, the
appeal or proceeding, together with the original papers, printed
records, and record entries duly certified, shall, by appropriate
orders, be transferred to the court to which it would have gone
had this Act been in full force and effect at the time such
appeal was taken or other proceeding commenced, and further
proceedings in respect of the case shall be had in the same
manner and with the same effect as if the appeal or other
proceeding had been filed in such court.
"(3) A petition for rehearing or a petition for rehearing en
banc in a matter decided before the effective date of this Act
[Oct. 1, 1981], or submitted before the effective date of this
Act and decided on or after the effective date as provided in
paragraph (1) of this section, shall be treated in the same
manner and with the same effect as though this Act had not been
enacted. If a petition for rehearing en banc is granted, the
matter shall be reheard by a court comprised as though this Act
had not been enacted.
"Sec. 10. As used in sections 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of this Act, the
term -
"(1) 'former fifth circuit' means the fifth judicial circuit of
the United States as in existence on the day before the effective
date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981];
"(2) the term 'new fifth circuit' means the fifth judicial
circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by
section 2(2) of this Act [amending item relating to the fifth
circuit in this section]; and
"(3) the term 'eleventh circuit' means the eleventh judicial
circuit of the United States established by the amendment made by
section 2(3) of this Act [adding item relating to the eleventh
circuit in this section]."
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION BY FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS;
TERMINATION OF COURT
Section 11 of Pub. L. 96-452 provided that: "The court of appeals
for the fifth circuit as constituted on the day before the
effective date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1981] may take such
administrative action as may be required to carry out this Act
[amending sections 41, 44, and 48 of this title, and enacting
provisions set out as notes under this section]. Such court shall
cease to exist for administrative purposes on July 1, 1984."
APPEALS COURT ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS
Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 6, Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633, provided
that: "Any court of appeals having more than 15 active judges may
constitute itself into administrative units complete with such
facilities and staff as may be prescribed by the Administrative
Office of the United States Courts, and may perform its en banc
function by such number of members of its en banc courts as may be
prescribed by rule of the court of appeals."
NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS
Pub. L. 95-157, Sec. 1(a), Nov. 8, 1977, 91 Stat. 1265, provided
that the Northern Mariana Islands be part of the same judicial
circuit as Guam, i.e., the Ninth Circuit. See section 1694(a) of
Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
COMMISSION ON REVISION OF THE FEDERAL APPELLATE SYSTEM
Pub. L. 92-489, Oct. 13, 1972, 86 Stat. 807, as amended by Pub.
L. 93-420, Sept. 19, 1974, 88 Stat. 1153, provided for the
establishment, membership, travel expenses, personnel, experts and
consultants, administrative and research services, cooperation of
other governmental agencies, and appropriations of not to exceed
$606,000 of a Commission on Revision of the Federal Court Appellate
System which Commission was to study the geographical division of
the judicial circuits and the structure and internal procedures of
the appellate court system and to report to the President,
Congress, and the Chief Justice its recommendations for changes in
the geographical boundaries of the circuits to expedite disposition
of judicial business and for changes in the appellate court
structure to expedite disposition of the appellate courts caseload
in a manner consistent with fundamental concepts of fairness and
due process. The Commission was to cease existence ninety days
after submission of its final report, which report was submitted
June 20, 1975.
CONTINUATION OF ORGANIZATION OF COURT
Section 2(b) of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 985,
provided in part that the provisions of this title as set out in
section 1 of act June 25, 1948, with respect to the organization of
each of the several courts therein provided, shall be construed as
continuations of existing law, and the tenure of the judges,
officers, and employees thereof and of the United States attorneys
and marshals and their deputies and assistants, in office on Sept.
1, 1948, shall not be affected by its enactment, but each of them
shall continue to serve in the same capacity under the appropriate
provisions of this title, pursuant to his prior appointment.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 42 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 42. Allotment of Supreme Court justices to circuits
-STATUTE-
The Chief Justice of the United States and the associate justices
of the Supreme Court shall from time to time be allotted as circuit
justices among the circuits by order of the Supreme Court. The
Chief Justice may make such allotments in vacation.
A justice may be assigned to more than one circuit, and two or
more justices may be assigned to the same circuit.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 870.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 215 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch.
231, Sec. 119, 36 Stat. 1131; Dec. 23, 1944, ch. 724, 58 Stat.
925).
The authority of the Chief Justice in vacation to assign a
circuit justice to more than one circuit was extended by omitting
the phrase "whenever by reason of death or resignation, no Justice
is allotted to a circuit."
The provision in section 215 of Title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., that,
for the purposes of said section, the "District of Columbia shall
be deemed to be a judicial circuit," was omitted, since the
District of Columbia is made a judicial circuit by section 41 of
this title.
The last paragraph was added to make clear the intent of Congress
that the powers of the Court to assign the justices among the
several circuits should be completely flexible.
Changes were made in phraseology.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 43 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 43. Creation and composition of courts
-STATUTE-
(a) There shall be in each circuit a court of appeals, which
shall be a court of record, known as the United States Court of
Appeals for the circuit.
(b) Each court of appeals shall consist of the circuit judges of
the circuit in regular active service. The circuit justice and
justices or judges designated or assigned shall be competent to sit
as judges of the court.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 870; Pub. L. 88-176, Sec. 1(a),
Nov. 13, 1963, 77 Stat. 331.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 212 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch.
231, Sec. 117, 36 Stat. 1131).
The provision in section 212 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for a
three-judge court of appeals was permissive and did not limit the
power of the court to sit in banc. Thus, subsection (b) reflects
present status of law, namely, that court is composed of not only
circuit judges of the circuit in active service, of whom there may
be more than three, but the circuit justice or justices and judges
who may be assigned or designated to the court. (See Textile Mills
Securities Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1942,
62 S.Ct. 272, 314 U.S. 326, 86 L.Ed. 249 and Reviser's Notes under
section 46 of this title.)
Words "with appellate jurisdiction, as hereinafter limited and
established" were omitted as covered by section 1291 et seq. of
this title, conferring appellate jurisdiction on the courts of
appeals.
The term "court of appeals" was substituted in this section and
throughout this title for the term "circuit court of appeals."
Provision for a quorum of the court is now covered by section
46(d) of this title.
AMENDMENTS
1963 - Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 88-176 inserted "regular" before
"active service".
-CHANGE-
CHANGE OF NAME OF COURT
Section 2(b) of act June 25, 1948, provided in part that each
circuit court of appeals should, after Sept. 1, 1948, be known as a
United States Court of Appeals, but that the enactment of act June
25, 1948 should in no way entail any loss of rights, interruption
of jurisdiction, or prejudice to matters pending in any such courts
on Sept. 1, 1948.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 44 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 44. Appointment, tenure, residence and salary of circuit
judges
-STATUTE-
(a) The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and
consent of the Senate, circuit judges for the several circuits as
follows:
Circuits Number of
Judges
--------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia 12
First 6
Second 13
Third 14
Fourth 15
Fifth 17
Sixth 16
Seventh 11
Eighth 11
Ninth 28
Tenth 12
Eleventh 12
Federal 12.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Circuit judges shall hold office during good behavior.
(c) Except in the District of Columbia, each circuit judge shall
be a resident of the circuit for which appointed at the time of his
appointment and thereafter while in active service. While in active
service, each circuit judge of the Federal judicial circuit
appointed after the effective date of the Federal Courts
Improvement Act of 1982, and the chief judge of the Federal
judicial circuit, whenever appointed, shall reside within fifty
miles of the District of Columbia. In each circuit (other than the
Federal judicial circuit) there shall be at least one circuit judge
in regular active service appointed from the residents of each
state (!1) in that circuit.
(d) Each circuit judge shall receive a salary at an annual rate
determined under section 225 of the Federal Salary Act of 1967 (2
U.S.C. 351-361), as adjusted by section 461 of this title.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 871; Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, Sec.
1, 63 Stat. 493; Feb. 10, 1954, ch. 6, Sec. 1, 68 Stat. 8; Mar. 2,
1955, ch. 9, Sec. 1(b), 69 Stat. 10; Pub. L. 87-36, Sec. 1(b), May
19, 1961, 75 Stat. 80; Pub. L. 88-426, title IV, Sec. 403(b), Aug.
14, 1964, 78 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 89-372, Sec. 1(b), Mar. 18, 1966,
80 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 90-347, Sec. 3, June 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 184;
Pub. L. 94-82, title II, Sec. 205(b)(2), Aug. 9, 1975, 89 Stat.
422; Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 3(b), Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1632; Pub.
L. 96-452, Sec. 3, Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat. 1994; Pub. L. 97-164,
title I, Sec. 102, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 25; Pub. L. 98-353, title
II, Sec. 201(b), July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 346; Pub. L. 101-650,
title II, Sec. 202(b), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5099; Pub. L.
102-198, Sec. 10(c), Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1626; Pub. L. 105-119,
title III, Sec. 307, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2493.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 213, and sections
11-201, 11-202, District of Columbia Code, 1940 ed. (Feb. 9, 1893,
ch. 74, Sec. 1, 27 Stat. 434; Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 854, Secs. 221,
222, 31 Stat. 1224; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, Sec. 118, 36 Stat. 1131;
Jan. 13, 1912, ch. 9, 37 Stat. 52; Feb. 25, 1919, ch. 29, Sec. 2,
40 Stat. 1156; Sept. 14, 1922, ch. 306, Sec. 6, 42 Stat. 840; Mar.
3, 1925, ch. 437, 43 Stat. 1116; Dec. 13, 1926, ch. 6, Sec. 1, 44
Stat. 919; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 363, Sec. 2, 45 Stat. 1347; Mar. 1,
1929, ch. 413, Secs. 1, 2, 45 Stat. 1414; June 10, 1930, ch. 437,
46 Stat. 538; June 10, 1930, ch. 438, 46 Stat. 538; June 19, 1930,
ch. 538, 46 Stat. 785; June 16, 1933, ch. 102, 48 Stat. 310; Aug.
2, 1935, ch. 425, Sec. 1, 49 Stat. 508; June 24, 1936, ch. 735,
Sec. 1, 49 Stat. 1903; Apr. 14, 1937, ch. 80, 50 Stat. 64; May 31,
1938, ch. 290, Secs. 1, 3, 52 Stat. 584, 585; May 24, 1940, ch.
209, Sec. 1, 54 Stat. 219; Dec. 14, 1942, ch. 731, 56 Stat. 1050;
Dec. 7, 1944, ch. 521, Sec. 1, 58 Stat. 796; July 31, 1946, ch.
704, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 716).
This section includes the members of the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia and designates them as
"judges" rather than as "justices", thus harmonizing it with the
provisions of section 41 of this title, which specifically
designates the District of Columbia as a judicial circuit of the
United States. In doing so it consolidates sections 11-201, 11-202
of the District of Columbia Code, 1940 ed., which provided for one
"chief justice" and five associate "justices."
Act February 9, 1893, established a court of appeals for the
District of Columbia to consist of one chief justice and two
associate justices whose jurisdiction was almost entirely to review
the judgments of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, the
name of which was changed in 1936 to the District Court of the
United States for the District of Columbia. Circuit courts were
established by the first Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789, Sec.
4, and R.S. Sec. 608, enacted June 22, 1874. R.S. Sec. 605 provided
that the words "circuit justice" and "justice of a circuit" should
designate the justice of the Supreme Court of the United States
allotted to any circuit; that "judge" when applied to any circuit
included such justice.
The Judiciary Appropriation Act, 1945, Act June 26, 1944, ch.
277, Sec. 202, 58 Stat. 358, provided that as used in that Act,
"the term 'circuit court of appeals' includes the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia; the term 'senior
circuit judge' includes the Chief Justice of the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia; and the term
'circuit judge' includes associate justice of the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia; and the term 'judge'
includes justice."
Provisions in section 11-202 of the District of Columbia Code,
1940 ed., and section 213 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., for
payment of salaries in monthly installments were omitted, since
time of payment is a matter of administrative convenience (20 Comp.
Gen. 834).
The exception in subsection (c) extends to circuit judges in the
District of Columbia the effect of the recent decision in U.S. ex
rel. Laughlin v. Eicher, D.C. 1944, 56 F.Supp. 972, holding that
residence requirement of section 1 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.,
did not apply to district judges in the District of Columbia. (See
Reviser's Note under section 134 of this title.)
The provision in section 213 of the title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.,
that "it shall be the duty of each circuit judge in each circuit to
sit as one of the judges of the circuit court of appeals in that
circuit from time to time according to law," was omitted as
unnecessary since the duty to serve is implied by the creation and
composition of the court in section 43 of this title.
Last sentence, providing that nothing in section 213 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed., should prevent a circuit judge from holding
district court as provided by law, was omitted as unnecessary. (See
section 291 of this title authorizing assignments to district
courts.)
Subsection (b) was added in conformity with the U.S.
Constitution, art. 3.
Changes were made in phraseology.
-REFTEXT-
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The effective date of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982,
referred to in subsec. (c), is the effective date of Pub. L.
97-164, Oct. 1, 1982. See Effective Date of 1982 Amendment note set
out under section 171 of this title.
Section 225 of the Federal Salary Act of 1967, referred to in
subsec. (d), is section 225 of Pub. L. 90-206, Dec. 16, 1967, 81
Stat. 642, as amended, which is classified to chapter 11 (Sec. 351
et seq.) of Title 2, The Congress.
-MISC2-
AMENDMENTS
1997 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105-119 inserted at end "In each
circuit (other than the Federal judicial circuit) there shall be at
least one circuit judge in regular active service appointed from
the residents of each state in that circuit."
1991 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102-198 substituted "the Federal
Courts Improvement Act of 1982" for "this Act".
1990 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101-650 altered number of permanent
circuit judgeships in named circuits as follows:
Circuits Former New
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Third 12 14
Fourth 11 15
Fifth 16 17
Sixth 15 16
Eighth 10 11
Tenth 10 12
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1984 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98-353 altered number of permanent
circuit judgeships in named circuits as follows:
Circuits Former New
--------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia 11 12
First 4 6
Second 11 13
Third 10 12
Fourth 10 11
Fifth 14 16
Sixth 11 15
Seventh 9 11
Eighth 9 10
Ninth 23 28
Tenth 8 10
Eleventh 12 12
Federal 12 12
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1982 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 102(a), inserted item
relating to Federal circuit with 12 judges.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 102(b), inserted provision
relating to requirement that judges of Federal judicial circuit
reside within fifty miles of the District of Columbia.
1980 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 96-452 substituted "14" for "26" in
item relating to fifth circuit, and added item relating to eleventh
circuit.
1978 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95-486 altered number of permanent
circuit judgeships in the named circuits as follows:
Circuits Former New
--------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia 9 11
First 3 4
Second 9 11
Third 9 10
Fourth 7 10
Fifth 15 26
Sixth 9 11
Seventh 8 9
Eighth 8 9
Ninth 13 23
Tenth 7 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1975 - Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94-82 substituted provision that each
circuit judge shall receive a salary at an annual rate determined
under section 225 of the Federal Salary Act of 1967, as adjusted by
section 461 of this title, for provision that each circuit judge
shall receive a salary of $33,000 a year.
1968 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90-347 increased the number of
circuit judges in the enumerated circuits as follows: Third
Circuit, eight to nine; Fifth Circuit, nine to fifteen; Sixth
Circuit, eight to nine; Ninth Circuit, nine to thirteen, and Tenth
Circuit, six to seven.
1966 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 89-372 increased the number of
circuit judges in the enumerated circuits as follows: Fourth
Circuit, five to seven; Sixth Circuit, six to eight; Seventh
Circuit, seven to eight; Eighth Circuit, seven to eight.
1964 - Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 88-426 increased the salary of the
circuit judges from $25,500 to $33,000.
1961 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 87-36 increased the number of circuit
judges in the enumerated circuits, as follows: Second Circuit, six
to nine; Third Circuit, seven to eight; Fourth Circuit, three to
five; Fifth Circuit, seven to nine; Seventh Circuit, six to seven;
and Tenth Circuit, five to six.
1955 - Subsec. (d). Act Mar. 2, 1955, increased the salary of
circuit judges from "$17,500" a year to "$25,500".
1954 - Subsec. (a). Act Feb. 10, 1954, increased the number of
circuit judges in the Fifth Circuit from six to seven, and in the
Ninth Circuit from seven to nine.
1949 - Subsec. (a). Act Aug. 3, 1949, increased the number of
circuit judges for the District of Columbia from six to nine, for
the third circuit from six to seven, for the seventh circuit from
five to six, and for the tenth circuit from four to five.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1990 AMENDMENT
Section 206 of title II of Pub. L. 101-650 provided that: "This
title [amending this section and section 133 of this title and
enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and
sections 133 and 331 of this title] shall take effect on the date
of the enactment of this title [Dec. 1, 1990]."
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section
402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96-452 effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section
12 of Pub. L. 96-452, set out as a note under section 41 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1964 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 88-426 effective on first day of first pay
period which begins on or after July 1, 1964, except to extent
provided in section 501(c) of Pub. L. 88-426, see section 501 of
Pub. L. 88-426.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1955 AMENDMENT
Amendment by act Mar. 2, 1955, effective Mar. 1, 1955, see
section 5 of act Mar. 2, 1955, set out as a note under section 31
of Title 2, The Congress.
NOMINATION TO FEDERAL JUDGESHIP ON NONDISCRIMINATORY BASIS
Section 211 of Pub. L. 98-353 provided that: "It is the sense of
the Congress that the President, in selecting individuals for
nomination to the Federal judgeships created by this Act [see Short
Title of 1984 Amendment note set out under section 151 of this
title], shall give due consideration to qualified individuals
without regard to race, color, sex, religion, or national origin."
CONTINUED SERVICE OF JUDGES
Section 165 of Pub. L. 97-164 provided that judges of United
States Court of Claims and of United States Court of Customs and
Patent Appeals in regular active service on Oct. 1, 1982, would
continue in office as judges of United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit and senior judges of United States Court of
Claims and of United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on
Oct. 1, 1982, would continue in office as senior judges of United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
CONGRESSIONAL STATEMENT REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF JUDGES
Section 168 of Pub. L. 97-164 provided that: "The Congress -
"(1) takes notice of the fact that the quality of the Federal
judiciary is determined by the competence and experience of its
judges; and
"(2) suggests that the President, in nominating individuals to
judgeships on the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit and the United States Claims Court [now United States
Court of Federal Claims], select from a broad range of qualified
individuals."
SALARY INCREASES
2003 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $164,000 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 2003, by Ex. Ord. No. 13282, Dec. 31, 2002, 68 F.R.
1133, as amended by Ex. Ord. No. 13291, Sec. 3, Mar. 21, 2003, 68
F.R. 14525, set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5,
Government Organization and Employees.
2002 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $159,100 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 2002, by Ex. Ord. No. 13249, Dec. 28, 2001, 67 F.R.
639, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
2001 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $153,900 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 2001, by Ex. Ord. No. 13182, Dec. 23, 2000, 65 F.R.
82879, 66 F.R. 10057, formerly set out as a note under section 5332
of Title 5.
2000 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $149,900 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 2000, by Ex. Ord. No. 13144, Dec. 21, 1999, 64 F.R.
72237, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1999 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $145,000 per
annum, by Ex. Ord. No. 13106, Dec. 7, 1998, 63 F.R. 68151, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1998 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $145,000 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 1998, by Ex. Ord. No. 13071, Dec. 29, 1997, 62 F.R.
68521, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1997 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $141,700 per
annum, by Ex. Ord. No. 13033, Dec. 27, 1996, 61 F.R. 68987,
formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1996 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $141,700 per
annum, by Ex. Ord. No. 12984, Dec. 28, 1995, 61 F.R. 237, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1995 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $141,700 per
annum, by Ex. Ord. No. 12944, Dec. 28, 1994, 60 F.R. 309, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1993 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $141,700 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 1993, by Ex. Ord. No. 12826, Dec. 30, 1992, 57 F.R.
62909, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1992 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $137,300 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 1992, by Ex. Ord. No. 12786, Dec. 26, 1991, 56 F.R.
67453, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1991 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $132,700 per
annum, effective on first day of first pay period beginning on or
after Jan. 1, 1991, by Ex. Ord. No. 12736, Dec. 12, 1990, 55 F.R.
51385, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1990 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $95,000 per annum,
and increased to $102,500, effective on first day of first pay
period beginning on or after Jan. 31, 1990, by Ex. Ord. No. 12698,
Dec. 23, 1989, 54 F.R. 53473, formerly set out as a note under
section 5332 of Title 5.
1989 - Salaries of circuit judges increased in the amount of 25
percent of their rates (as last in effect before the increase),
effective Jan. 1, 1991, see Pub. L. 101-194, title VII, Sec.
703(a)(3), Nov. 30, 1989, 103 Stat. 1768, set out as a note under
section 5318 of Title 5.
Salaries of circuit judges continued at $95,000 per annum by Ex.
Ord. No. 12663, Jan. 6, 1989, 54 F.R. 791, formerly set out as a
note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1988 - Salaries of circuit judges continued at $95,000 per annum
by Ex. Ord. No. 12622, Dec. 31, 1987, 53 F.R. 222, formerly set out
as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1987 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $95,000 per annum,
on recommendation of the President of the United States, see note
set out under section 358 of Title 2, The Congress.
Salaries of circuit judges increased to $85,700 effective on
first day of first pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1, 1987,
by Ex. Ord. No. 12578, Dec. 31, 1986, 55 F.R. 505, formerly set out
as a note under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization
and Employees.
1985 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $83,200 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1,
1985, by Ex. Ord. No. 12496, Dec. 28, 1984, 50 F.R. 211, as amended
by Ex. Ord. No. 12540, Dec. 30, 1985, 51 F.R. 577, formerly set out
as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1984 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $80,400 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Jan. 1,
1984, by Ex. Ord. No. 12456, Dec. 30, 1983, 49 F.R. 347, as amended
Ex. Ord. No. 12477, May 23, 1984, 49 F.R. 22041; Ex. Ord. No.
12487, Sept. 14, 1984, 49 F.R. 36493, formerly set out as a note
under section 5332 of Title 5.
1982 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $77,300 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1982, by Ex. Ord. No. 12387, Oct. 8, 1982, 47 F.R. 44981, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5. Ex. Ord. No. 12387
further provided that pursuant to section 140 of Pub. L. 97-92
funds are not available to pay a salary at a rate which exceeds the
rate in effect on Dec. 15, 1981, which was $74,300.
Maximum rate payable after Dec. 17, 1982, increased from $74,300
to $77,300, see Pub. L. 97-377, title I, Sec. 129(b)-(d), Dec. 21,
1982, 96 Stat. 1914, set out as a note under section 5318 of Title
5.
Limitations on use of funds for fiscal year ending Sept. 30,
1983, appropriated by any Act to pay the salary or pay of any
individual in legislative, executive, or judicial branch in
position equal to or above level V of the Executive Schedule, see
section 101(e) of Pub. L. 97-276, as amended, set out as a note
under section 5318 of Title 5.
1981 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $74,300 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1981, by Ex. Ord. No. 12330, Oct. 15, 1981, 46 F.R. 50921, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
Limitations on use of funds for fiscal year ending Sept. 30,
1982, appropriated by any Act to pay the salary or pay of any
individual in legislative, executive, or judicial branch in
position equal to or above level V of the Executive Schedule, see
sections 101(g) and 141 of Pub. L. 97-92, set out as a note under
section 5318 of Title 5.
1980 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $70,900 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1980, by Ex. Ord. No. 12248, Oct. 16, 1980, 45 F.R. 69199, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5. Ex. Ord. No. 12248
further provided that pursuant to Pub. L. 96-369 funds are not
available to pay a salary at a rate which exceeds the rate in
effect on Sept. 30, 1980, which was $60,662.50.
Limitations on use of funds for fiscal year ending Sept. 30,
1981, appropriated by any Act to pay the salary or pay of any
individual in legislative, executive, or judicial branch in
position equal to or above level V of the Executive Schedule, see
section 101(c) of Pub. L. 96-536, as amended, set out as a note
under section 5318 of Title 5.
1979 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $65,000 effective
on first day of first applicable pay period beginning on or after
Oct. 1, 1979, by Ex. Ord. No. 12165, Oct. 9, 1979, 44 F.R. 58671,
as amended by Ex. Ord. No. 12200, Mar. 12, 1980, 45 F.R. 16443,
formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5. Ex. Ord.
No. 12165 further provided that pursuant to Pub. L. 96-86 funds
appropriated for fiscal year 1980 may not be used to pay a salary
at a rate which exceeds an increase of 5.5 percent over the
applicable rate payable for such position or office in effect on
Sept. 30, 1978, which was $60,662.50 for circuit judges.
Applicability to funds appropriated by any Act for fiscal year
ending Sept. 30, 1980, of limitation of section 304 of Pub. L.
95-391 on use of funds to pay the salary or pay of any individual
in legislative, executive, or judicial branch in position equal to
or above Level V of the Executive Schedule, see section 101 of Pub.
L. 96-86, set out as a note under section 5318 of Title 5.
1978 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $60,700 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1978, by Ex. Ord. No. 12087, Oct. 7, 1978, 43 F.R. 46823, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5. Ex. Ord. No. 12087
further provided that pursuant to the Legislative Branch
Appropriation Act, 1979 [Pub. L. 95-391, title III, Sec. 304, Sept.
30, 1978, 92 Stat. 788, set out as a note under section 5318 of
Title 5], funds are not available to pay a salary at a rate which
exceeds the rate in effect on Sept. 30, 1978, which was $57,500.
1977 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $57,500 per annum,
on recommendation of the President of the United States, see note
set out under section 358 of Title 2, The Congress.
1976 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $46,800 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1976, by Ex. Ord. No. 11941, Oct. 1, 1976, 41 F.R. 43889, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5, Government
Organization and Employees. Ex. Ord. No. 11941 further provided
that pursuant to Legislative Branch Appropriation Act, 1977, funds
are not available to pay a salary at a rate which exceeds rate in
effect on Sept. 30, 1976, which was $44,600.
1975 - Salaries of circuit judges increased to $44,600 effective
on first day of first pay period beginning on or after Oct. 1,
1975, by Ex. Ord. No. 11883, Oct. 6, 1975, 40 F.R. 47091, formerly
set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5.
1969 - Salary of circuit judge increased from $33,000 to $42,500
per annum, commencing Feb. 14, 1969, on recommendation of President
of United States, see note set out under section 358 of Title 2,
The Congress.
1946 - Salaries of circuit judges increased from $12,500 to
$17,500 a year by act July 31, 1946, ch. 704, Sec. 1, 60 Stat. 716.
1926 - Salaries of circuit judges increased from $8,500 to
$12,500 a year by act Dec. 13, 1926, ch. 6, Sec. 1, 44 Stat. 919.
1919 - Salaries of circuit judges increased from $7,000 to $8,500
a year by act Feb. 25, 1919, ch. 29, Sec. 1, 40 Stat. 1156.
1911 - Salaries of circuit court judges set at $7,000 a year by
the Judicial Code of 1911, act Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, Sec. 1, 36
Stat. 1131.
ADDITIONAL JUDGES
Since 1925, the appointment of additional judges was authorized
by the following acts:
Second circuit. Act May 31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 1, 52 Stat. 584.
Third circuit. Act Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, Sec. 1, 63 Stat. 493;
act Dec. 7, 1944, ch. 521, Sec. 1, 58 Stat. 796; act June 10, 1930,
ch. 438, 46 Stat. 538; act June 24, 1936, ch. 735, Sec. 1, 49 Stat.
1903, repealed by act May 31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 3, 52 Stat. 585.
Fifth circuit. Act Dec. 14, 1942, ch. 731, 56 Stat. 1050; act May
31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 1, 52 Stat. 584; act June 10, 1930, ch.
437, 46 Stat. 538.
Sixth circuit. Act May 24, 1940, ch. 209, Sec. 1, 54 Stat. 219;
act May 31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 1, 52 Stat. 584.
Seventh circuit. Act Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, Sec. 1, 63 Stat. 493;
act May 31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 1, 52 Stat. 584.
Eighth circuit. Act May 24, 1940, ch. 209, Sec. 1, 54 Stat. 219;
act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 436, 43 Stat. 1116.
Ninth circuit. Act Apr. 14, 1937, ch. 80, 50 Stat. 64; act Aug.
2, 1935, ch. 425, Sec. 1, 49 Stat. 508; act June 16, 1933, ch. 102,
48 Stat. 310 (removing limitation on filling of vacancy); act Mar.
1, 1929, ch. 413, 45 Stat. 1414.
Tenth circuit. Act Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387, Sec. 1, 63 Stat. 493.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Act Aug. 3, 1949, ch. 387,
Sec. 1, 63 Stat. 493; act May 31, 1938, ch. 290, Sec. 2, 52 Stat.
584; act June 19, 1930, ch. 538, 46 Stat. 785.
Act Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 363, Sec. 2, 45 Stat. 1346, 1347 provided
that "There shall be in the sixth, seventh, and tenth circuits,
respectively, four circuit judges; and in the second and eighth
circuits, respectively, five circuit judges; and, in each of the
other circuits three circuit judges, to be appointed by the
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate."
Another part of section 1 of act Feb. 10, 1954, which amended
subsec. (a) of this section, provided for the appointment by the
President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, of the
additional judges for the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, provided for in
such amendment.
Section 1(a) of Pub. L. 87-36 provided that: "The President shall
appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, three
additional circuit judges for the second circuit, one additional
circuit judge for the third circuit, two additional circuit judges
for the fourth circuit, two additional circuit judges for the fifth
circuit, one additional circuit judge for the seventh circuit, and
one additional circuit judge for the tenth circuit."
Section 1(a) of Pub. L. 89-372 provided that: "The President
shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,
two additional circuit judges for the fourth circuit, two
additional circuit judges for the sixth circuit, one additional
circuit judge for the seventh circuit, and one additional circuit
judge for the eighth circuit."
Section 1(c) of Pub. L. 89-372, as amended by Pub. L. 90-347,
Sec. 2, June 18, 1968, 82 Stat. 183, provided that: "The President
shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,
four additional circuit judges for the fifth circuit." The second
sentence of section 1(c) of Pub. L. 89-372 which provided that the
first four vacancies occurring in the office of circuit judge in
the fifth circuit shall not be filled was deleted by section 2 of
Pub. L. 90-347, which also made those judgeships permanent and
further provided that the present incumbents of such judgeships
shall henceforth hold their offices under this section.
Section 1 of Pub. L. 90-347 provided: "That the President shall
appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, one
additional circuit judge for the third circuit, two additional
circuit judges for the fifth circuit, one additional circuit judge
for the sixth circuit, four additional circuit judges for the ninth
circuit, and one additional circuit judge for the tenth circuit."
Section 3(a) of Pub. L. 95-486 provided that: "The President
shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,
one additional circuit judgeship for the first circuit, two
additional circuit judgeships for the second circuit, one
additional circuit judgeship for the third circuit, three
additional circuit judgeships for the fourth circuit, eleven
additional circuit judgeships for the fifth circuit, two additional
circuit judgeships for the sixth circuit, one additional circuit
judgeship for the seventh circuit, one additional circuit judgeship
for the eighth circuit, ten additional circuit judgeships for the
ninth circuit, one additional circuit judgeship for the tenth
circuit, and two additional circuit judgeships for the District of
Columbia."
Section 201(a) of Pub. L. 98-353 provided that:
"(1) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (2), the President
shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,
two additional circuit judges for the first circuit court of
appeals, two additional circuit judges for the second circuit court
of appeals, two additional circuit judges for the third circuit
court of appeals, one additional circuit judge for the fourth
circuit court of appeals, two additional circuit judges for the
fifth circuit court of appeals, four additional circuit judges for
the sixth circuit court of appeals, two additional circuit judges
for the seventh circuit court of appeals, one additional circuit
judge for the eighth circuit court of appeals, five additional
circuit judges for the ninth circuit court of appeals, two
additional circuit judges for the tenth circuit court of appeals,
and one additional circuit judge for the District of Columbia
circuit court of appeals.
"(2) The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and
consent of the Senate, no more than 11 of such judges prior to
January 21, 1985."
Section 202(a) of Pub. L. 101-650 provided that: "The President
shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate -
"(1) 2 additional circuit judges for the third circuit court of
appeals;
"(2) 4 additional circuit judges for the fourth circuit court
of appeals;
"(3) 1 additional circuit judge for the fifth circuit court of
appeals;
"(4) 1 additional circuit judge for the sixth circuit court of
appeals;
"(5) 1 additional circuit judge for the eighth circuit court of
appeals; and
"(6) 2 additional circuit judges for the tenth circuit court of
appeals."
-EXEC-
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 11972
Ex. Ord. No. 11972, Feb. 14, 1977, 42 F.R. 9659, as amended by
Ex. Ord. No. 11993, May 24, 1977, 42 F.R. 27197, which related to
the United States Circuit Judge Nominating Commission, was revoked
by Ex. Ord. No. 12059, May 11, 1978, 43 F.R. 20949, formerly set
out below.
EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 12059
Ex. Ord. No. 12059, May 11, 1978, 43 F.R. 20949, as amended by
Ex. Ord. No. 12097, Nov. 8, 1978, 43 F.R. 52455, which established
the United States Circuit Judge Nominating Commission and provided
for its membership, functions, etc., was revoked by Ex. Ord. No.
12305, May 5, 1981, 46 F.R. 25421, set out as a note under section
14 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act in the Appendix to Title
5, Government Organization and Employees.
-SECREF-
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in section 992 of this title.
-FOOTNOTE-
(!1) So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 45 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 45. Chief judges; precedence of judges
-STATUTE-
(a)(1) The chief judge of the circuit shall be the circuit judge
in regular active service who is senior in commission of those
judges who -
(A) are sixty-four years of age or under;
(B) have served for one year or more as a circuit judge; and
(C) have not served previously as chief judge.
(2)(A) In any case in which no circuit judge meets the
qualifications of paragraph (1), the youngest circuit judge in
regular active service who is sixty-five years of age or over and
who has served as circuit judge for one year or more shall act as
the chief judge.
(B) In any case under subparagraph (A) in which there is no
circuit judge in regular active service who has served as a circuit
judge for one year or more, the circuit judge in regular active
service who is senior in commission and who has not served
previously as chief judge shall act as the chief judge.
(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the chief judge of
the circuit appointed under paragraph (1) shall serve for a term of
seven years and shall serve after expiration of such term until
another judge is eligible under paragraph (1) to serve as chief
judge of the circuit.
(B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), a circuit judge
acting as chief judge under subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph
(2) shall serve until a judge has been appointed who meets the
qualifications under paragraph (1).
(C) No circuit judge may serve or act as chief judge of the
circuit after attaining the age of seventy years unless no other
circuit judge is qualified to serve as chief judge of the circuit
under paragraph (1) or is qualified to act as chief judge under
paragraph (2).
(b) The chief judge shall have precedence and preside at any
session of the court which he attends. Other circuit judges of the
court in regular active service shall have precedence and preside
according to the seniority of their commissions. Judges whose
commissions bear the same date shall have precedence according to
seniority in age. The circuit justice, however, shall have
precedence over all the circuit judges and shall preside at any
session which he attends.
(c) If the chief judge desires to be relieved of his duties as
chief judge while retaining his active status as circuit judge, he
may so certify to the Chief Justice of the United States, and
thereafter the chief judge of the circuit shall be such other
circuit judge who is qualified to serve or act as chief judge under
subsection (a).
(d) If a chief judge is temporarily unable to perform his duties
as such, they shall be performed by the circuit judge in active
service, present in the circuit and able and qualified to act, who
is next in precedence.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 871; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, Sec.
35, 65 Stat. 723; Pub. L. 85-593, Sec. 1, Aug. 6, 1958, 72 Stat.
497; Pub. L. 97-164, title II, Secs. 201, 204, Apr. 2, 1982, 96
Stat. 51, 53.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on sections 216 and 216a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.
(Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, Sec. 120, 36 Stat. 1132; May 23, 1934, ch.
339, 48 Stat. 796).
Subsection (a), providing for "chief judge," is new. Such term is
adopted to replace the term "senior circuit judge" in recognition
of the great increase in administrative duties of such judge.
Subsection (b) conforms with section 4 of this title relating to
precedence of associate justices of the Supreme Court, and
consolidates the provisions of the second and third sentences of
section 216 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. The designation when
filed in the court of appeals will not only record the transfer of
function from the relieved chief judge to his successor, but will
also determine the question of willingness of the successor to
serve.
Other provisions of section 216 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed.,
are covered by section 47 of this title.
Subsection (c) is new.
Subsection (d) is based on section 216a of title 28, U.S.C., 1940
ed.
The official status of the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia holding office on the effective date
of the act is preserved by section 2 of the bill to enact revised
Title 28.
Changes were made in phraseology.
AMENDMENTS
1982 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 201(a), designated
existing first sentence of subsec. (a) as par. (1), substituted
"The chief judge of the circuit shall be the circuit judge in
regular active service who is senior in commission of those judges
who - (A) are sixty-four years of age or under; (B) have served for
one year or more as a circuit judge; and (C) have not served
previously as chief judge" for "The circuit judge in regular active
service who is senior in commission and under seventy years of age
shall be the chief judge of the circuit" in par. (1) as so
designated, designated existing second sentence of subsec. (a) as
par. (2)(A), substituted "In any case in which no circuit judge
meets the qualifications of paragraph (1), the youngest circuit
judge in regular active service who is sixty-five years of age or
over and who has served as circuit judge for one year or more shall
act as the chief judge" for "If all the circuit judges in regular
active service are seventy years of age or older the youngest shall
act as chief judge until a judge has been appointed and qualified
who is under seventy years of age, but a judge may not act as chief
judge until he has served as a circuit judge for one year" in par.
(2)(A) as so designated, and added pars. (2)(B) and (3).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 204, inserted "of the court in
regular active service" after "circuit judges" in second sentence.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 201(b), amended subsec. (c)
generally, substituting "the chief judge of the circuit shall be
such other circuit judge who is qualified to serve or act as chief
judge under subsection (a)" for "the circuit judge in active
service next in precedence and willing to serve shall be designated
by the Chief Justice as the chief judge of the circuit".
1958 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85-593 provided that chief judges of
circuit courts cease to serve as such upon reaching the age of
seventy, that the youngest circuit judge act as chief judge where
all circuit judges in regular active service are seventy years or
older until a judge under seventy has been appointed and qualified,
and that circuit judge must have served one year before acting as
chief judge.
1951 - Subsec. (a). Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted "in active
service who is".
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section
402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1958 AMENDMENT
Section 3 of Pub. L. 85-593, as amended by Pub. L. 95-486, Sec.
4, Oct. 20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1632, provided that: "The amendments to
sections 45 and 136 of title 28 of the United States Code made by
this Act shall take effect at the expiration of one year from the
date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 6, 1958]."
SAVINGS PROVISION
Section 203 of part A of title II of Pub. L. 97-164 provided
that:
"(a) The amendments to section 45 of title 28, United States
Code, and to section 136 of such title, made by sections 201 and
202 of this Act, shall not apply to or affect any person serving as
chief judge on the effective date of this Act [Oct. 1, 1982].
"(b) The provisions of section 45(a) of title 28, United States
Code, as in effect on the day before the effective date of this Act
[Oct. 1, 1982], shall apply to the chief judge of a circuit serving
on such effective date. The provisions of section 136(a) of title
28, United States Code, as in effect on the day before the
effective date of this part [Oct. 1, 1982], shall apply to the
chief judge of a district court serving on such effective date."
APPOINTMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE OF COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL
CIRCUIT
Section 166 of Pub. L. 97-164 provided that: "Notwithstanding the
provisions of section 45(a) of title 28, United States Code, the
first chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit shall be the Chief Judge of the United States Court
of Claims or the Chief Judge of the United States Court of Customs
and Patent Appeals, whoever has served longer as chief judge of his
court. Notwithstanding section 45 of title 28, United States Code,
whichever of the two chief judges does not become the first chief
judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
under the preceding sentence shall, while in active service, have
precedence and be deemed senior in commission over all the circuit
judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit (other than the first chief judge of that circuit). When
the person who first serves as chief judge of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacates that position, the
position shall be filled in accordance with section 45(a) of title
28, United States Code, as modified by the preceding sentence of
this section."
CHIEF JUDGE OF COURT OF APPEALS FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Section 2(a) of act June 25, 1948, provided in part that the
Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
in office on Sept. 1, 1948, shall thereafter be known as the Chief
Judge.
-SECREF-
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in sections 353, 372 of this title.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 46 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 46. Assignment of judges; panels; hearings; quorum
-STATUTE-
(a) Circuit judges shall sit on the court and its panels in such
order and at such times as the court directs.
(b) In each circuit the court may authorize the hearing and
determination of cases and controversies by separate panels, each
consisting of three judges, at least a majority of whom shall be
judges of that court, unless such judges cannot sit because recused
or disqualified, or unless the chief judge of that court certifies
that there is an emergency including, but not limited to, the
unavailability of a judge of the court because of illness. Such
panels shall sit at the times and places and hear the cases and
controversies assigned as the court directs. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall determine by rule a
procedure for the rotation of judges from panel to panel to ensure
that all of the judges sit on a representative cross section of the
cases heard and, notwithstanding the first sentence of this
subsection, may determine by rule the number of judges, not less
than three, who constitute a panel.
(c) Cases and controversies shall be heard and determined by a
court or panel of not more than three judges (except that the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may sit in
panels of more than three judges if its rules so provide), unless a
hearing or rehearing before the court in banc is ordered by a
majority of the circuit judges of the circuit who are in regular
active service. A court in banc shall consist of all circuit judges
in regular active service, or such number of judges as may be
prescribed in accordance with section 6 of Public Law 95-486 (92
Stat. 1633), except that any senior circuit judge of the circuit
shall be eligible (1) to participate, at his election and upon
designation and assignment pursuant to section 294(c) of this title
and the rules of the circuit, as a member of an in banc court
reviewing a decision of a panel of which such judge was a member,
or (2) to continue to participate in the decision of a case or
controversy that was heard or reheard by the court in banc at a
time when such judge was in regular active service.
(d) A majority of the number of judges authorized to constitute a
court or panel thereof, as provided in paragraph (c), shall
constitute a quorum.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 871; Pub. L. 88-176, Sec. 1(b),
Nov. 13, 1963, 77 Stat. 331; Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 5(a), (b), Oct.
20, 1978, 92 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, Sec. 103, title
II, Sec. 205, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 25, 53; Pub. L. 104-175, Sec.
1, Aug. 6, 1996, 110 Stat. 1556.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based in part on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 212 (Mar. 3,
1911, ch. 231, Sec. 117, 36 Stat. 1131).
Subsections (a)-(c) authorize the establishment of divisions of
the court and provide for the assignment of circuit judges for
hearings and rehearings in banc.
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that,
notwithstanding the three-judge provision of section 212 of title
28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., a court of appeals might lawfully consist of
a greater number of judges, and that the five active circuit judges
of the third circuit might sit in banc for the determination of an
appeal. (See Textile Mills Securities Corporation v. Commissioner
of Internal Revenue, 1941, 62 S.Ct. 272, 314 U.S. 326, 86 L.Ed.
249.)
The Supreme Court in upholding the unanimous view of the five
judges as to their right to sit in banc, notwithstanding the
contrary opinion in Langs Estate v. Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, 1938, 97 F.2d 867, said in the Textile Mills case: "There
are numerous functions of the court, as a 'court of record, with
appellate jurisdiction', other than hearing and deciding appeals.
Under the Judicial Code these embrace: prescribing the form of
writs and other process and the form and style of its seal (28
U.S.C., Sec. 219); the making of rules and regulations (28 U.S.C.,
Sec. 219); the appointment of a clerk (28 U.S.C., Sec. 221) and the
approval of the appointment and removal of deputy clerks (28
U.S.C., Sec. 222); and the fixing of the 'times' when court shall
be held (28 U.S.C., Sec. 223). Furthermore, those various sections
of the Judicial Code provide that each of these functions shall be
performed by the court."
This section preserves the interpretation established by the
Textile Mills case but provides in subsection (c) that cases shall
be heard by a court of not more than three judges unless the court
has provided for hearing in banc. This provision continues the
tradition of a three-judge appellate court and makes the decision
of a division, the decision of the court, unless rehearing in banc
is ordered. It makes judges available for other assignments, and
permits a rotation of judges in such manner as to give to each a
maximum of time for the preparation of opinions.
Whether divisions should sit simultaneously at the same or
different places in the circuit is a matter for each court to
determine.
-REFTEXT-
REFERENCES IN TEXT
Section 6 of Public Law 95-486 (92 Stat. 1633), referred to in
subsec. (c), is section 6 of Pub. L. 95-486, Oct. 20, 1978, 92
Stat. 1633, which is set out as an Appeals Court Administrative
Units note under section 41 of this title.
-MISC2-
AMENDMENTS
1996 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104-175, in last sentence, inserted
"(1)" after "eligible" and ", or (2) to continue to participate in
the decision of a case or controversy that was heard or reheard by
the court in banc at a time when such judge was in regular active
service" before period at end.
1982 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 103(a), substituted
"panels" for "divisions".
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 103(b), substituted "panels"
for "divisions" wherever appearing and inserted provisions
requiring that at least a majority of the panels of each circuit be
judges of that court, unless such judges cannot sit because recused
or disqualified, or unless the chief judge of that court certifies
that there is an emergency including, but not limited to, the
unavailability of a judge of the court because of illness, and that
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
determine by rule a procedure for the rotation of judges from panel
to panel to ensure that all of the judges sit on a representative
cross section of the cases heard and determine by rule the number
of judges, not less than three, who constitute a panel.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97-164, Secs. 103(c), 205, inserted
provision that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit may sit in panels of more than three judges if its rules so
provide and that, as an alternative to the requirement that a court
in banc consist of all circuit judges in regular active service,
such a court may consist of such number of judges as may be
prescribed in accordance with section 6 of Public Law 95-486 (92
Stat. 1633), except that any senior circuit judge of the circuit
shall be eligible to participate, at his election and upon
designation and assignment pursuant to section 294(c) of this title
and the rules of the circuit, as a member of an in banc court
reviewing a decision of a panel of which such judge was a member.
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 103(d), substituted "panel" for
"division".
1978 - Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 5(b), substituted "panels" for
"divisions" in section catchline.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 95-486, Sec. 5(a), substituted "panel" for
"division" and struck out provision authorizing a retired circuit
judge to sit as a judge of the court in banc in the rehearing of a
case if he sat in the court or division in the original hearing of
such case.
1963 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 88-176 inserted "regular" before
"active service" wherever appearing, and provided that a retired
circuit judge shall be competent to sit as a judge of the court in
banc, in a rehearing if he sat in at the original hearing.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section
402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this
title.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 47 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 47. Disqualification of trial judge to hear appeal
-STATUTE-
No judge shall hear or determine an appeal from the decision of a
case or issue tried by him.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 872.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 216, and District of
Columbia Code, 1940 ed., Sec. 11-205 (Feb. 9, 1893, ch. 74, Sec. 6,
27 Stat. 435; July 30, 1894, ch. 172, Sec. 2, 28 Stat. 161; Mar. 3,
1901, ch. 854, Sec. 225, 31 Stat. 1225; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, Sec.
120, 36 Stat. 1132).
The provision in section 11-205 of the District of Columbia Code,
1940 ed., that a justice of the district court while on the bench
of the Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia shall not sit
in review of judgment, order, or decree rendered by him below, was
consolidated with a similar provision of section 216 of title 28,
U.S.C., 1940 ed. The consolidation simplifies the language without
change of substance.
References in said section 11-205 to the power to prescribe
rules, requisites of record on appeal, forms of bills of exception,
and procedure on appeal, were omitted as covered by Rules 73, 75,
76, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and by Rule 51 of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
Said section 11-205 contained a provision that on a divided
opinion by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia the
decision of the lower court should stand affirmed. This was omitted
as unnecessary as merely expressing a well-established rule of law.
Other provisions of said section 11-205 are incorporated in
section 48 of this title.
The provision of section 216 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with
respect to the competency of justices and judges to sit, was
omitted as covered by section 43 of this title.
Specific reference in said section 216 to the Chief Justice of
the United States was likewise omitted inasmuch as he sits as a
circuit justice.
The provision of said section 216 with respect to assignment of
district judges was omitted as covered by section 291 et seq. of
this title.
Provision of said section 216 relating to presiding judge was
omitted as covered by section 44 of this title.
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 48 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 48. Terms of court
-STATUTE-
(a) The courts of appeals shall hold regular sessions at the
places listed below, and at such other places within the respective
circuit as each court may designate by rule.
Circuits Places
--------------------------------------------------------------------
District of Columbia Washington.
First Boston.
Second New York.
Third Philadelphia.
Fourth Richmond, Asheville.
Fifth New Orleans, Fort Worth, Jackson.
Sixth Cincinnati.
Seventh Chicago.
Eighth St. Louis, Kansas City, Omaha, St. Paul.
Ninth San Francisco, Los Angeles, Portland,
Seattle.
Tenth Denver, Wichita, Oklahoma City.
Eleventh Atlanta, Jacksonville, Montgomery.
Federal District of Columbia, and in any other
place listed above as the court by rule
directs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) Each court of appeals may hold special sessions at any place
within its circuit as the nature of the business may require, and
upon such notice as the court orders. The court may transact any
business at a special session which it might transact at a regular
session.
(c) Any court of appeals may pretermit any regular session of
court at any place for insufficient business or other good cause.
(d) The times and places of the sessions of the Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit shall be prescribed with a view to securing
reasonable opportunity to citizens to appear before the court with
as little inconvenience and expense to citizens as is practicable.
-SOURCE-
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 872; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, Sec.
36, 65 Stat. 723; Pub. L. 96-452, Sec. 4, Oct. 14, 1980, 94 Stat.
1994; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, Sec. 104, Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 26;
Pub. L. 102-572, title V, Sec. 501, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4512.)
-MISC1-
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 223 and Sec. 11-205
District of Columbia Code, 1940 ed. (Feb. 9, 1893, ch. 74, Sec. 6,
27 Stat. 435; July 30, 1894, ch. 172, Sec. 2, 28 Stat. 161; Mar. 3,
1901, ch. 854, Sec. 225, 31 Stat. 1225; Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, Sec.
126, 36 Stat. 1132; July 17, 1916, ch. 246, 39 Stat. 385; Jan. 8,
1925, ch. 57, 43 Stat. 729; July 3, 1926, ch. 735, 44 Stat. 809;
Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 363, Sec. 3, 45 Stat. 1347; May 17, 1932, ch.
190, 47 Stat. 158).
This section consolidates section 223 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940
ed., with part of section 11-205 of the District of Columbia Code.
Reference to San Juan as a place for holding court in the First
Circuit was omitted. The revised section will permit the holding of
terms at San Juan when the public interest requires.
The phrase "and at such other places within the respective
circuits as may be designated by rule of court" was added to enable
each court of appeals to hold such additional regular terms as
changing circumstances might require.
The provisions of such section 223, for furnishing suitable rooms
and accommodation at Oakland City, were omitted as obsolete since
the erection of a new Federal building there.
The provisions as to fixed times for holding court in the Fifth
Circuit was omitted as inconsistent with the practice in the other
circuits. Words "San Francisco, Los Angeles, Portland, Seattle"
were substituted for "San Francisco and two other places designated
by the court" to conform with the practice in the Ninth Circuit.
Changes were made in phraseology.
SENATE REVISION AMENDMENT
By Senate amendment, Jacksonville (Fla.) was added as a place for
holding a regular session of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit. See 80th Congress Senate Report No. 1559.
AMENDMENTS
1992 - Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102-572 struck out ", with the
consent of the Judicial Conference of the United States," after
"pretermit".
1982 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 104(a), (b), designated
introductory provisions and table of circuits as subsec. (a) and
substituted provisions directing the courts of appeals to hold
regular sessions at the places listed in the table and at such
other places within the circuits as each court might designate by
rule, for provisions which directed that terms or sessions of
courts of appeals be held annually at the places listed in the
table and at such other places as the courts might designate by
rule and authorized each court of appeals to hold special terms at
any place within its circuit, and added to the table an item for
the Federal circuit, with sessions to be held in the District of
Columbia and in any other place listed elsewhere in the table as
the Federal circuit court might by rule direct.
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 104(c), added subsec. (b).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 104(c), designated existing
provisions following table of circuits as subsec. (c) and
substituted "regular session" for "regular term or session".
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 97-164, Sec. 104(c), added subsec. (d).
1980 - Pub. L. 96-452 substituted "New Orleans, Fort Worth,
Jackson" for "New Orleans, Atlanta, Fort Worth, Jacksonville,
Montgomery" in item relating to fifth circuit, and added item
relating to eleventh circuit.
1951 - Act Oct. 31, 1951, inserted last par.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1992 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 102-572 effective Jan. 1, 1993, see section
1101(a) of Pub. L. 102-572, set out as a note under section 905 of
Title 2, The Congress.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1982 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section
402 of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of this
title.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1980 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96-452 effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section
12 of Pub. L. 96-452, set out as a note under section 41 of this
title.
SURVEY OF JUDICIAL BUSINESS IN ALASKA
Section 23(a) of Pub. L. 86-70, June 25, 1959, 73 Stat. 147,
provided that: "The Judicial Conference of the United States, with
the assistance of the Administrative Office of the United States
Courts, shall conduct a study, including a field survey, of the
Federal judicial business arising in the State of Alaska with a
view toward directing the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit to hold such terms of court in Anchorage or such
other Alaskan cities as may be necessary for the prompt and
efficient administration of justice."
-End-
-CITE-
28 USC Sec. 49 01/06/03
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART I - ORGANIZATION OF COURTS
CHAPTER 3 - COURTS OF APPEALS
-HEAD-
Sec. 49. Assignment of judges to division to appoint independent
counsels
-STATUTE-
(a) Beginning with the two-year period commencing on the date of
the enactment of this section, three judges or justices shall be
assigned for each successive two-year period to a division of the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to be
the division of the court for the purpose of appointing independent
counsels. The Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit shall serve as the clerk of such
division of the court and shall provide such services as are needed
by such division of the court.
(b) Except as provided under subsection (f) of this section,
assignment to such division of the court shall not be a bar to
other judicial assignments during the term of such division.
(c) In assigning judges or justices to sit on such division of
the court, priority shall be given to senior circuit judges and
retired justices.
(d) The Chief Justice of the United States shall designate and
assign three circuit court judges or justices, one of whom shall be
a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia, to such division of the court. Not more than one judge or
justice or senior or retired judge or justice may be named to such
division from a particular court.
(e) Any vacancy in such division of the court shall be filled
only for the remainder of the two-year period in which such vacancy
occurs and in the same manner as initial assignments to such
division were made.
(f) Except as otherwise provided in chapter 40 of this title, no
member of such division of the court who participated in a function
conferred on the division under chapter 40 of this title involving
an independent counsel shall be eligible to participate in any
judicial proceeding concerning a matter which involves such
independent counsel while such independent counsel is serving in
that office or which involves the exercise of such independent
counsel's official duties, regardless of whether such independent
counsel is still serving in that office.
-SOURCE-
(Added Pub. L. 95-521, title VI, Sec. 602(a), Oct. 26, 1978, 92
Stat. 1873; amended Pub. L. 97-409, Sec. 2(b)(1), Jan. 3, 1983, 96
Stat. 2039; Pub. L. 99-554, title I, Sec. 144(g)(3), Oct. 27, 1986,
100 Stat. 3097; Pub. L. 100-191, Secs. 4, 5(a), Dec. 15, 1987, 101
Stat. 1307.)
-REFTEXT-
REFERENCES IN TEXT
The date of enactment of this section, referred to in subsec.
(a), is Oct. 26, 1978.
-MISC1-
AMENDMENTS
1987 - Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100-191, Sec. 4, inserted at end:
"The Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit shall serve as the clerk of such division of
the court and shall provide such services as are needed by such
division of the court."
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 100-191, Sec. 5(a), substituted "involving
an independent counsel" for "involving a independent counsel".
1986 - Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 99-554 substituted "chapter 40" for
"chapter 39" in two places.
1983 - Pub. L. 97-409, Sec. 2(b)(1)(B), substituted "independent
counsels" for "special prosecutors" in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97-409, Sec. 2(b)(1)(B), substituted
"independent counsels" for "special prosecutors".
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 97-409, Sec. 2(b)(1)(A), (C), substituted
"independent counsel" for "special prosecutor" wherever appearing
and "independent counsel's" for "special prosecutor's".
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1986 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 99-554 effective 30 days after Oct. 27,
1986, see section 302(a) of Pub. L. 99-554, set out as a note under
section 581 of this title.
EFFECTIVE DATE
Section effective Oct. 26, 1978, see section 604 of Pub. L.
95-521, set out as a note under section 591 of this title.
-SECREF-
SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS
This section is referred to in sections 593, 595 of this title.
-End-
Descargar
Enviado por: | El remitente no desea revelar su nombre |
Idioma: | inglés |
País: | Estados Unidos |