Analysis of sentence

Grammar. Syntactic structure. Categories. Levels. Phrases. Morphemes. Words

  • Enviado por: El remitente no desea revelar su nombre
  • Idioma: inglés
  • País: España España
  • 38 páginas
publicidad
cursos destacados
Iníciate en LOGIC PRO 9
Iníciate en LOGIC PRO 9
Vamos a ver de manera muy sencilla y en un breve paseo de poco más de una hora como funciona uno de los...
Ver más información

Iníciate con Ableton Live
Iníciate con Ableton Live
El curso da un repaso general por las órdenes y menús más básicos, para poder generar...
Ver más información

publicidad

1. INTRODUCTION

This assignment is based on the detailed analysis of sentence and its constituents from different points of view. The concept of sentence is important in the sense that all the languages combine them. In other words, speakers use sentences in order to communicate their ideas or thoughts. So, sentences have a decisive role within communication.

Generally speaking, there are lexical, morphological and syntactic between the different categories. This assignment has been done by using Radford´s and Ouhalla´s works.

2. The Sentence: definition of this grammatical concept with its main and general characteristics from different points of view

According to the traditional grammar, sentences consist of words, but not every string of word constitute a sentence as we can see in the following example:

Lion cage this less in dangerous is the.

A possible analysis is that if we look at this example we know the meaning of the individual words, but the sequence as a whole does not make sense, so we cannot consider this structure a sentence. Thus, we can affirm that if a sequence of words is to constitute a sentence, it must he meaningful, for instance:

The lion is less dangerous in this cage.

The network of relations between the words of a sentence is called its structure. There are many different aspects that influence the structure of a sentence. A very important one is word order. The different order of the words in a sentence can bring by a difference in its meaning, as in the following example:

Did he say who he was?= Who did he say he was?

But a difference in word order does not always imply a difference in meaning. Sometimes it simply entails a difference in emphasis:

John ran away //A way ran John .

In relation with the words, the structure of the sentence also depends on the individual meaning of the words or word-groups making up the sentence; in the following example the difference of structure is not due to word order but to the relationship between the words:

Peter was waiting for seven friends. //Peter was waiting for seven minutes.

Then this kind of Grammar deals with the concept of Ambiguous sentences and explains that the structure of sentences is not always unambiguously derivable from overt marks like word order, lexical items etc... Sometimes we come across sentences to which more than one structure can he assigned, having therefore, more than one meaning. This type of sentence receives the name of Ambiguous Sentence, as in the following examples:

George likes Susan more than Joan // Visiting relatives can be boring.

Only through the context in which these sentences may appear can we know which of the two possible meanings is intended.

According to the Transformational Grammar, it deals with the idea that a sentence has a syntactic structure, and it follows this term in order to develop its theory.

The first important point deals with the idea that the evidence for claiming that sentences have a syntactic structure in language comes from the native speaker's intuition about the structure of sentences in his language. These structural intuitions which native speakers have about the Syntax of their languages are two types:

1. The constituents: intuitions about how sound-sequences in sentences are structured into larger structural units.

2. Categories: intuitions about whether structural units belong to the same category or not. So, the following example is going to illustrate this fact:

This pupil must seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher.

To analyse the concept of sentence we can do the following analysis: words are grouped into lower constituents. For example “incredibly" modifies "intelligent”, so the sequence [ incredibly intelligent] is a phrasal constituent of the sentence. Also, following the analysis, 'this" modifies "pupil", so the sequence [that pupil] forms a single structural unit, a constituent of the sentence. The same happens in the sequence [that teacher]. But furthermore also the sequence [to that teacher] is another constituent. To the transformational grammar, the phrases [incredibly intelligent] and [to that teacher] both modify "seem”, then the whole sequence [seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher] is also a constituent.

Thus, all this information can he represented as we see before in diagrammatic form, that is a tree diagram. Each point in the tree is called a node, and each node represents a constituent. But, however, since nodes are predictable, later they were suppressed in subsequent tree-diagrams. But a tree-diagram does not provide any representation of our intuitions about which constituents are constituents of the same type. The traditional way of describing the similarities and differences between constituents is to say that they belong to categories of various types. And the same happens with the phrases. Finally, to this type of grammar, the whole sequence [that pupil must seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher] is a special type of constituent traditionally termed a clause or sentence.

3. conventions to Be used in the analysis of a sentence, the constituents aNd its levels

Every sentence can he analysed at four distinct form levels: the word-level, the phrase-level, the clause-level and the sentence- level. And this is called the rank scale. Later, after the explanation of the constituents of a sentence we will see the different levels and how they can he analysed following the same example.

Then, following the example mentioned before:

"This pupil must seem incredibly intelligent to the teacher"

We can represent the categorical constituent structure of the sentence in terms of labelled tree diagram below:

Thus, a diagram as this provides a visual presentation of the categorial constituent structure of the sentence. It shows us how sentence is structured out of its constituent phrases, and how each of the phrases is structured out of its component words, and also it provides a visual presentation of the phrase structure of sentence. The type of labelled tree- diagram used here is referred to as a Phrase-marker (P-marker) because it marks the hierarchical grouping of words into phrases, and phrases into sentences.

Another method of visual display used in the linguistic literature is to make use of labelled bracketing. Within this system, we could represent the categorial status of the words in the structure mentioned before as in the following example:

[D This] [N pupil] [M must] [V seem] [Adv incredibly] [A intelligent] [P to]

[D that] [N teacher]

We could use this system of labelled bracketing to represent the fact that [this pupil] and [that teacher] are noun phrases, that [to that teacher] is a prepositional phrase. That [incredibly intelligent] is an adjective phrase, that [seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher] is a verb phrase, and that [this pupil must seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher] is an "S" = clause. As follows:

[S [NP [D this] [N pupil]] [M must] [VP [V seem] [AP [ADV incredibly][A intelligent]] [PP [P to][NP [D that] [N teacher] ] ] ] ]

Then the two diagrams represented here contain the same information. Many linguists prefer tree-diagrams as a form of visual representation of syntactic structure because they are easier to read, and the reason for that is that the information they contain is less condensed.

Thus, diagrams like these provide a virtually complete representation of the syntactic structure of the sentence.

Also we can find partial tree-diagrams or partial labelled bracketings: for instance if we take the sentence mentioned before, we can see that it contains three major constituents:

1. The noun phrase [this pupil].

2. A modal auxiliary verb [must].

3. A verb Phrase [seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher].

Then in place of the full tree-diagram, we also can have the partial P-maker, that follows this scheme:

This pupil must seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher.

In this type of diagrams it is quite common to use a “triangle" to represent constituents with a complex internal structure. Also in place of the detailed labelled bracketing, we can have the partial bracketing as we can see in the following example:

[S [NP this pupil] [M must] [VP seem incredibly intelligent to that teacher]]

Linguists tend to use labelled tree diagrams for a full representation of the syntactic structure of a sentence, and labelled bracketings for partial representation of structure. But both systems of representation are equivalent.

In relation with the constituents, we speak of constituents to refer to the different parts in which a sentence can be divided, as we have seen before. Constituents can be regarded as elements that play a role in larger structures or can also be looked upon as linguistic units in their own right. So we can say that sentences are built up out of sets of constituents, each of which belongs to a specific category. And as we have seen before this categorial constituent structure can be represented schematically in the form of a Phrase-marker-labelled tree diagram or labelled bracketing.

Then again, regarding the concept of constituents, if we consider the constituents of a sentence as individual linguistic units we can speak of phrases, words and morphemes and their different types:

1 .Phrases: noun phrases, verb phrases, adjective phrases, prepositional phrases, adverbial phrases and so on.

2.Words: Noun, verb, adjective, adverb , prepositions and so on .

3.Morphemes: bound and free morphemes.

These constituents can be regarded as elements that play a role in larger structures, and also we can look upon them as linguistic units in their own right, and as independent linguistic units they have their own characteristics. For instance phrases do not resemble sentence, although it is their natural function to serve as constituents of sentences; for instance in:

"Their grandmother takes the train "

We see that all the constituents serve to form the sentence: [their grandmother], [takes] [the train]. Then we can distinguish different types of phrases:

1. Noun phrase.

2. Adjective phrase.

3. Adverb phrase.

4. Verb phrase.

5. Prepositional phrase.

Then a phrase can be identified on the basis of the word class membership of its most important constituent; Thus, a noun phrase is a phrase which has a noun as its most important constituent, an adjective phrase is a phrase whose principal element is an adjective and so. The element that gives name to a noun phrase, adjective phrase or other phrases is the head of the phrase. The other elements in the phrase stand in a relation of dependency on, or subordination to, the head. This fact usually happens in the noun phrase, adjective phrase or adverb phrase. In these three types of phrases, the dominant element is that which can replace the whole phrase without affecting the structure of the sentence, as we can see in the following examples:

1. " She likes classical music" can be replaced by "She likes music = that is a noun phrase.

2. "Sarah is quite nervous" can be replaced by "Sarah is nervous" = that is a verb phrase.

Noun phrases can function as immediate constituents of sentences and immediate constituents of other phrases. Sentence functions are typically realised by noun phrases are those of: Subject, direct object, indirect object, benefactive object, subject attribute and object attribute.

There are two sentence-functions that are less closely associated with the noun phrase, that of predicator complement and that of adverbial.

The only phrase type in which the noun phrase functions as a typical immediate constituent is the prepositional phrase. In prepositional phrase the noun phrase is the usual realization of the function prepositional complement:

"opposite the parking". Also sometimes a noun phrase is found within another noun phrase, where it follows the head of that phrase in a function resembling that of postmodifier.

The adjective phrases as constituents of clauses and sentences, can only realise the functions subject attribute and object attribute.

Adverb phrases as constituents of sentences and clauses nearly always realise the function adverbial. Three types of adverbial functions can be distinguished:

1. Conjuncts: they function as the connecting link between the sentence in which they occur and the preceding context.

2. Disjunct: they usually function as comment words, that is they provide the speaker's comment on the content or form of the utterance.

3. All other adverbs that are constituents of a clause or sentence function as adjuncts.

Then the most important idea is that the dominant element has been called HEAD and any other element in the phrase depends on it.

Verb phrases and prepositional phrases do not have a head. In the verb phrase all the constituents are always verbs and none of them can replace the others. In this type of phrases all the immediate constituents are verbs. Every verb phrase has a dominant member, which is invariably a lexical verb. The lexical verb is always the last constituent of the phrase. Other, subordinated, constituents precede the lexical verb, and invariably belong to the class of auxiliary, or "helping" verbs (either modal or primary). There is thus a one-to-one correspondence between function and category within the internal structure of the verb phrase.

When we consider the verb phrase as a constituent of the clause or sentence, the verb phrase can realise only one function on sentence level, viz that of predicator.

The verb phrase exhibits a number of features that are not found in any of the other phrase types: aspect, voice, tense and mood. Another feature of the finite verb phrase is that it often exhibits concord: agreement in person and number between the verb phrase and the subject.

In the prepositional phrase the preposition, which is the dominant element, cannot replace the whole phrase either. However, all the elements in the prepositional phrase depend on it. The preposition is said to govern them. Then, the structure of the prepositional phrase is determined by its two functions: prepositional and prepositional complement. The constituent realising the former governs the one realising the latter. Both functions are obligatory and they usually occur immediately after each other.

The immediate constituents of prepositional phrases that function on clause or sentence level may, under certain conditions, be found in different places in the clause or sentence, the prepositional complement occurring in initial position and the prepositional after the predicate or in final position.

As an immediate constituents of the sentence or clause, the prepositional phrase usually functions as adverbials, either as adjunct, as conjunct or as disjunct. Less usually, a prepositional phrase may occur as subject, as subject attribute, as object attribute or as predicator complement.

Then, we can see that within a phrase we can also find different functions, functions at the level of the phrase. The head is the most important one, but there are also others such as the modifiers.

Finally, as the most important idea in relation with the phrases is that they are usually constituents of sentences but they can also be constituents of other phrases.

Then the following level in relation to the constituents are the words as constituents of phrases and within them we can find the morphemes as constituents of words. So the morpheme is the minimal unit of grammatical description in the sense that it cannot be segmented any further at the level of grammatical analysis. In relation with the words, we see how they form phrases, which in turn combine into sentences Then the structure of the sentence also depends on the individual meanings of the words or word-groups making up the sentence. Then through the following examples:

Maggie was speaking for two friends.

Maggie was speaking for two minutes.

Here the difference of structure is not due to word order but to the relationship between the words.

Then words can be grouped together into word classes. This can be done taking into account morphological, syntactic and semantic criteria.

1.morphological: words that belong to the class of verbs generally take inflectional endings such as -s,-ing, .ed.

2.Syntactic: it has to do with the way words function in sentences and phrases. From a syntactic point of view, we can affirm that although there is not a one correspondence between functions and categories like in the phrases, most categories have a typical function associated with it. Verbs are associated with the sentence function predicator, nouns with subject or direct object, adverbs with adverbial and so on.

3.Semantic: this type of criteria is less reliable indicator of word class membership. We may distinguish two classes of words: open word class and closed word class:

-open word class: the membership is unrestricted, that is, new words can be added. Within the class we have nouns, adjectives, adverbs, and verbs.

-Closed word class: the membership is restricted, that is, it does not allow the addition of new members. We have prepositions, conjunctions, articles, numerals, interjections, pronouns and quantifiers.

Then if we consider constituents as part of a larger structure we can establish a hierarchy of linguistic units. Morphemes function as constituent of words, words as constituents of phrases and phrases as constituents of sentences. This hierarchy is called rankscale as we can see in the following example:

"her friend has bought the house"

the house

house

Also in relation to the constituents of a sentence, we can observe that the subordinators for instance introduce clauses as constituents of sentences or phrases, as we can see in the following example:

“That Peter is intelligent is obvious"

In relation to the concept of clause as constituent of the sentence, clause is a synonym of sentence. Then in terms of the functions they can play in the structure of the sentences, we can distinguish the following types:

a. Subject clauses.

b. Direct object clauses.

c. lndirect object clauses.

d. Benefactive object clauses.

e. Subject attributive clauses.

f. Object attributive clauses.

g. Predicator complement clauses.

h. Adverbial clauses.

However, units are not always composed of units of the next lowest rank. A unit of a given rank may function as a constituent of a unit of the same rank or even of a unit which is one step lower down the rankscale. This is called rankshift.

Then after this explanation of the constituents of a sentence, we can affirm that the sentence can be analyzed from four different levels:

1.The word-level.

2.The phrase-level.

3.The clause-level.

4.The sentence-level.

Then we are going to illustrate this analysis through the following example:

“ Tom believes that John was saying a lie"

1. Word level:

[N Tom ] [V believes] [Comp that] [N John] [V was saying] [Det a] [N lie]

2. Phrase level:

[NP [ N Tom ] ] [VP [V believes] [Comp that] [NP [N John]] [VP [V was saying] [NP [DET a] [N lie]

3 .Clause level:

[ MC [ NP[ N Tom]] [VP [V believes] [ Sub C [ Comp that ] [NP [N John] [VP [ V was saying ] [ NP [Det a ] [ N lie] ] ] ] ] ]

4. Sentence level:

[S/MC [NP [N Tom] ] [ VP [V believes] [Sub C [Comp that] [NP [N John] [VP [V was saying] [NP [ Det a ] [ N lie] ] ] ] ] ]

So as we explain before each time lower levels have been included in higher levels. But then we see at the beginning of the work that a tree diagram is better to see a clear representation of the sentence, in which we can observe the constituents of the sentence, how the subordinate clause is a constituent of VP, because the that-clause specifies what is Ton Smith believes and it is a direct object of the verb believe:

S/MC

NP VP

N V SubC

NP VP

Comp N V NP

DET N

Tom believes that John was saying a lie

Then as a conclusion we can say that tree-diagrams are very useful to represent the hierarchical relations between the various constituent parts of a sentence.

Then in relation with the semantic analysis of a sentence, we look at its meaning:

1. The thematic role or participant role.

2. Predicates and their elements.

When we talk about the thematic structure, we deal with the argument of the structure. For instance in relation to the argument: NP, and the thematic role, for instance we can say agent. To illustrate this we can see the following example:

“ Sheila sent a letter”

Then we can represent its thematic structure and its argument through the following way:

[1 NP, Agent, 2 NP, Theme]

Or for instance another example could be:

" Anthony puts the fish on the fridge" = puts (verb)

[1 NP, Agent, 2 NP, Theme , 3 PP, Goal ]

Then this is what is called the thematic structure of the preposition. Then following this analysis , also we can make representations through these tree-diagrams or labelled bracketing not only the representations of sentences, but also analysis of the constituents of the sentences, for instance of the phrases which are the most common ones, as we can see in the following examples:

“A window and a key"= [NP[NP a window] and [NP a key] ]

NP

NP NP

A window and a key

“ intelligent and serious" = [AP[AP intelligent] and [ AP serious] ]

AP

AP AP

Intelligent and serious

Then as a conclusion to this point, there is a hierarchical order and two words (for example: key and window or intelligent and serious) can be grouped together in order to form a phrase. In the case of “a window and a key”, both of them form a noun phrase. However, in the case of “intelligent and serious”, both of them form an adjective phrase because the two heads ( intelligent and serious) are adjectives.

4. CONCLUSION

According to grammarians, it can be said that there is a hierarchical order. That is to say, sounds are the constituents of words, words are the constituents of the phrases and phrases are the constituents of sentences or clauses.

Then as a conclusion to this point, we can say that sentences are not just unstructured sequence of sounds; rather they have a hierarchical constituent structure in which sounds are grouped together into words, words into phrases, and phrases into sentences. On the other hand, it is important to point out the main features of the different categories although they have not been explained in this assignment. That is to say, when we talk about sentences, it is absolutely necessary to know the features of the categories as constituents of the own sentence.

In a nutshell, it can be said that Radford's book, Ouhalla´s work and the linguistics dictionaries are a useful guide for the student in the sense that they make easier the comprehension of grammar. It is due to the fact that they give us (as students) a clear information by using simple examples.

5. Glossary

A-bar movement An A-bar movement operation is one which moves a maximal projection into an A-bar position (i.e. a non-argument position, or more specifically, a position which can be occupied by expressions which are not arguments). So, operator movement scrambling and the kind of adjunction operation whereby this kind of behav­iour is adjoined to the clause containing it in a sentence such as this kind of behaviour cannot tolerate are all specific types of A-bar movement.

Ajacency condition A condition requiring that two expressions must be immediately adjacent (i.e. one must immediately follow the other) in order for some operation to apply. For example, to can only contract onto want (forming wanna) if the two are immediately adjacent.

Adjective. A category of word which often denotes states (eg. happy,sad), which typically has an adverb counterpart in + ly (cf sad/sadly), which typically has comparative/superlative forms in +er/+est (cf. sadder/saddest), which can often take the prefix +un (cf. unhappy), and which can often form a noun by the addition of +ness (cf. sadness).

Adjunct One way in which this term is used to denote an optional constituent typically used to specify e.g. the time, location or manner in which an event takes place (e.g. in the pub is an adjunct in a sentence such as We had a drink in the pub). Another way in which it is used to denote a constituent which has been adjoined to another to form an extended constituent .

Adjunction A process by which one word is adjoined (= attached) to another to form a compound word, or one phrase is adjoined to another phrase to form an even larger phrase. For example, we might say that in a sentence such as He shouldn`t go, not (in the guise of its contracted form n`t) has been adjoined to the auxiliary should to form the negative auxiliary shouldn't. Likewise, in a sentence such as You know that such behaviour we cannot tolerate, we might argue that such behaviour has been adjoined to the we-clause.

Agreement Two words (or expressions) are said to agree in respect of some grammatical feature(s) if they have the same value for the relevant feature(s):so, in a sentence such as He smokes, the verb smokes is said to agree with its subject he because both are third person singular expressions.

Ambiguous An expression is ambiguous if it has more than one interpretation. For example, a sen­tence such as He loves her more than you is ambigu­ous by virtue of the fact that it has two interpretations, one paraphraseable as 'He loves her more than he loves you', ale other as 'He loves her more than you love her.'

A movement Movement from one A position to another (typically, from a subject or complement position into another subject position).

Anaphor An anaphor is an expression (like himself) which cannot have independent reference, but which must take its reference from an antecedent (i.e. expression which it refers to) within the same phrase or sentence. Hence, while we can say John is deluding himself ( where himself refers back to John) , we cannot say *Himself is waiting, since the anaphor himself here has no antecedent.

Antecedent An expression which is referred to by a pronoun or anaphor of some kind. For example, in John cut himself shaving, John is the antecedent of the anaphor himself, since himself refers back to John. In a sentence such as He is someone whom we respect, the antecedent of the pronoun whom is someone.

A position A position which can be occupied by an argurnent, but not by a nonargument expression (e.g. not by an adjunct) - e.g. a subject position, or a position as the complement of a verb, adjective or noun.

Argument This is a term borrowed by linguists from philosophy (more specifically, from predicate calcu­lus) to describe the role played by particular types of expression in the semantic structure of sentences. In a sentence such asjohn hit Fred, the overalí sen­tence is said to be a proposition (a term used to describe the semantic content of a clause), and to consist of the predicate hit and its two arguments John and Fred. The two arguments represent the two participants in the act of hitting, and the predicate is the expression (in this case the verb hit) which describes the activity in which they are engaged. By extension, in a sentence such as John says he hates syntax the predicate is the verb says, and its two arguments are John and the clause he hates syntax; the second argument he hates syntax is in turn a proposition whose predicate is hates, and whose two arguments are he and syntax. Since the comple­ment of a verb is positioned internally within V-bar whereas the subject of a verb is positioned outside V-bar, complements are also referred to as internal arguments, and sub­jects as external arguments. Expressions which do not function as arguments are nonarguments. The argument structure of a predicate provides a descrip­tion of the set of arguments associated with the predicate, and the thematic role which each fulfils in relation to the predicate .

Aspect A term typically used to denote the duration of the activity described by a verb (e.g. whether the activity is ongoing or completed). In sentences such as:

(i) He has taken the medicine (ji) He is taking the medicine

the auxiliary has is said to be an auxiliary which marks perfective aspect, in that it marks the perfec­tion (in the sense of 'completion' or 'termination') of the activity of taking the medicine; for analogous reasons, taken is said to be a perfective (participle) verb form in (i) (though is referred to in traditional grammars as a past participle) Similarly, is is said to be an auxiliary which marks imperfective or progressive aspect in (ii), because it relates to an activity and hence which is ongoing or in progress (for this reason, is in (ii) is also referred to as a progressive or imperfective auxiliary); in the same way, the verb taking in (ii) is said to be the imperfective or progres­sive (participle) form of the verb (though is known in traditional grammars as a present participle).

AUX/Auxiliary A term used to describe items such as will/ would /can /could l shall / should /may l might / must /ought and some uses of have / be / do l need /dare. Such items differ from typical lexical verbs e.g. in that they undergo inversion (cf. Can 1 help you?).

Auxilary selection This term relates to the type of verb which a given auxiliary selects as its comple­ment: e.g. in many languages (the counterpart of) be when used as a perfective auxiliary selects only a complement headed by an unaccusative verb (like come, go, etc.), whereas (the counterpart of) have selects a complement headed by other types of verb.

Bare A bare infinitive clause is a clause which con­tains a verb in the infinitive form, but does not con­tain the infinitive particle to - e.g. the bracketed clause in He won't let [me help him]. A bare noun is a noun used without any determiner to modif

(e.g. fish in Fish is smelly).

Base form The base form of a verb is the simplest, uninflected form of the verb (the form under which the relevant verb would be listed in an English dic­tionary) - hence forma like go/be/have/see/want/ love are the base forms of the relevant verbs.

Binary A term relating to a two-valued property or -relation. For example, number is a binary property in English, in that we have a two-way contrast between singular forma like cat and plural forma like cats. It is widely assumed that parameters have bina­ry settings, that features have binary values, and that ah branching in syntactic structure is binary.

Binary-branching A tree diagram in which every nonterminal node (i.e. every node not at the very bottom of the tree) branches down into two other nodes is binary-branching.

Category A term used to denote a set of expressions which share a common set of linguistic properties. In syntax, the term is used for expressions which share a common set of grammatical (i.e. morpholog­ical syntactic) properties. For example, boy and girl belong to the (grammatical) category noun because they both inflect for plural number (cf. boys/girls), and can both terminate a sentence such as The police haven't yet found the missing - .

C-command A structural relation between two con­stituents. To use a simple train-station metaphor, one node carrying the category label X c-commands another carrying the category label Y if you can get from X to Y by taking a northbound train from X, getting off at the first stop, and then taking a south­bound train to Y (on a different line). The c-com­mand con4ition on binding is a condition to the effect that a bound constituent (e.g. a reflexive anaphor like himself or the trace of a moved con­stituent) must be c-commanded by its antecedent (i.e. by the expression which binds it). This amounts to claiming that the antecedent must be higher up in the structure than the anaphor/trace which it binds

Checking (theory) In Chomsky's checking theory, words carry grammatical features which have to be checked in the course of a derivation. For example, a nominative pronoun like I must have Its nominative case checked, which means that it must occupy a nominative position (as the subject of the kind of constituent which allows a nominative subject, e.g. a finite auxiliary) at some point in the derivation. When a feature has been checked, it is erased if it is uninterpretable (i.e. if it la a purely formal feature with no semantic content); Any uninterpretable features which remain unchecked (and hence which have not been erased) at the level of logical form will cause the derivation to crash (i.e. to be ungrammatical).

Clitic(ization) The term clitic denotes an item which resembles a word but which has the property that it must cliticize (i.e. each itself) to another word. For example, we could say that the contracted negative particle n't is a clitic which attaches itself to a finite auxiliary verb, so giving rise to forms like isn't, shouldn't, mtghtn't, etc. Likewise, we might say that ve is a clitic form of have which attaches itself to (for examp1e) a pronoun ending in a vowel or diphthong, so giving rise to forms like we've etc.

Complement. This is a term used to denote a specific grammatical function (in the same way that the term subject denotes a specific grammatical function). A complement is an expression which combines with a head word to project the head into a larger structure of essentially the same kind. In close the door, the door is the complement of close; in after dinner, din­ner is the complement of after; in good at physics, at physics is the complement of good; In loss of face, Of faces the complement of loss. As these examples illustrate, complements typically , follow their heads in English. The choice of complement (and the mor­phological form of the complement)is determined by properties of the head: for example, an auxiliary such as will requires as its complement an expres­sion headed by a verb in the infinitive form (cf. He will go/*going/*gone home). Moreover, complements bear a close semantic relation to their heads (e.g. in kill him, him is the complement of the verb kill and plays the thematic role of PATI ENT argument of the verb kill). Thus, a complement has a close morpho­logical, syntactic and semantic relation to its head. A complement clause is a clause which is used as the complement of some other word (typically as the complement of a verb, adjective or noun). Thus, in a sentence such as He never expected that she would come, the clause that she would come serves as the complement of the verb expected, and so is a com­plement clause. Complement features are features that specify the kind of complement which a given head can have

Complementizer This term is used in two ways. On the one hand, it denotes a particular category of clause-introducing word such as that / if / for, as used in sentences such as 1 think that you should apolo­gize, 1 doubt if she realizes, They're been for you lo show up. On the other hand, it is also used to denote the presubject position in clauses ('the complemen­tizer postion') which is typically occupied by a com­plementizer like that l if /for, but which can also be occupied by an inverted auxiliary in sentences such as Can you help?, where can is taken to occupy the complementizer position in the clause. In general, I use the term complementizer to denote the relevant category, and the abbreviated terms COMP and C to denote the associated position. A complementizer phrase (CP) is a phrase/clause headed by a comple­mentizer (or by an auxiliary or verb moved into COMP).

Control(ler)/Control predicate In an infinitive structure with a PRO subject like John decided to PRO quit, the antecedent of PRO (i.e. the expres­sion which PRO refers back to, in this case John) is said to be the controller of PRO (or to control PRO), and conversely PRO is said to be controlled by its antecedent; the relevant kind of structure is called a control structure. Verbs like try which take a com­plement containing a PRO subject controlled by the subject of try are called subject-control predicates; verbs like decided (as used in sentences such as What decided you to take syntax?) which take an infinitive complement whose PRO subject is con­trolled by the object of the main verb (here, the you object of decided) are called object-control predi­cates.

Coordination A process by which two similar expressions are joined together by and/or (e.g. John is coordinated with Mary in 1 couldn't find John or Mary).

/Copula/Copular Verb A verb used to link a subject with a verbless predicate. The main copular verb in English is be (though verbs like become, remain, slay, etc. also have the same copular - i.e. linking -function). In sentences such as They are lazy, They are fools and They are outside, the verb are is said to be a copula in that it links the subject they to the adjective predicate lazy, or the noun predicate fools, nr the prepositional predicate outside.

Descriptive adequacy A grammar of a particular language attains descriptive adequacy if it correctly specifies which strings of words do (and don't) form grammatical phrase and sentences in the language, and correctly describes the structure and interpretation­ of the relevant phrases and sentence.

Determiner phrase/DP A phrase like (such) a pity which comprises a determiner a, a noun comple­ment pity and an (optional) specifier such. In earlier work, a determiner + noun sequence would have been analysed 55 a noun phrase (= NP), with the determiner occupying the specifier position within NP.

Ellipsis/Elliptical Ellipsis is a process by which an expression is omitted in order to avoid repetition. For example, in a sentence such as I will do it ¡f you will do it, we can ellipse (i.e. omit) the a second occurrence if do it to avoid repetition, and hence say 1w ill do ¡1 if you will: the resulting sentences an elliptical structure (i.e. a structure from which something has been omitted).

Embedded clause An embedded clause is a clause which is positioned internally within some other phrase or clause. For example, in a sentence such as He may suspect that 1 hid them, the hid-clause (= that I hid them) is embedded within the suspect clause.

Empty category A category which is covert (i.e. which is silent or null and hence has no overt phonetic form). Empty categories include traces, the null pronouns PRO and pro, the null generic/ partitive determiner

Explanatory adequacy A linguistic theory meet the criterion of explanatory adequacy if it explains why grammars have the properties that they do, and how children come to acquire grammars in such a short period of time.

Finite The term finite verb/clause denotes an auxil­iary or nonauxiliary verb, or clause which can have a subject with nominative case like I/we/he/she/they. Thus, if we compare the two bracketed clauses in:

(i) What if [people annoy her]? (ii) Don't let [people annoy her

We find that the bracketed clause and the verb annoy in (i) are finite because in place of the subject people we can have a nominative pronoun like they; by contrast, the bracketed clause and the verb annoy are nonfinite in (ii) because people cannot be replaced by a nominative pronoun like they (only by an objective pronoun like them): cf.

(iii) What if [they annoy her]? (iv)*Don't let [they annoy her]

By contrast, a verb or clause which has a subject with objective or null casis nonfinite; hence the bracketed clauses and bold-printed verbs are non­finite in the examples below:

(v) Don't let [them annoy you] (vi) You should try [to PRO stay calm]

In general, finite verbs carry tense/agreement prop­erties, whereas nonfinite verbs are tenseless and agreementless forma (i.e. forma which do not overtly inflect for tense/agreement - e.g. infinitive forma like be, and +ing/+n participle forma like being/ been are nonfinite).

Floating quantifier A quantifier which does not immediately precede the expression which it quanti­fies. For example, in a sentence such as The students have all passed their exams, all quantifies (but is not positioned in front of) the students, so that all is a floating (or stranded) quantifier here.

Gapping A form of ellipsis in which a head word is omitted from one (or more) parallel structures, to avoid repetition. For example, the italicized second occurrence of bought can be gapped (i.e. omitted) in a sentence such Es John bought an apple and Mary bought a pear, giving John bought an apple, and Mary a pear.

Grammar The study of how words, phrases and sentences are formed. A grammar of a language is a description of how words, phrases and sentences are formed in the relevant language.

Grammatical A phrase or sentence is grammatical if it contains no morphological error (i.e. no error relating to the morphological form of any word) or syntactic error (i.e. no error relating to the position occupied by any of the words or phrases).

Head This term has two main uses. The head (con­stituent) of a phrase is the key word which deter­mines the properties of the phrase. So, in a phrase such as fond of fast food, the head

INFL A category devised by Chomsky whose mem­bers include finite auxiliaries (which are INFLected for tense/agreement), and the INFinitivaL particle to.

Lexicon/ lexical The word lexical is used in a number of different ways . Since a lexicon is a dictionary , the expression lexical item means “word”, the expression lexical entry means “the entry in the dictionary for a particular word” , the term lexical property means “property associated with some individual word” , and the term lexical learning means “learning words and their idiosyncratic properties”. However, the word lexical is also used in a second sense, in which it is contrasted with functional. In this second sense, a lexical category is a category whose members are contentives.

Modal / Modality A modal auxiliary is an auxiliary which expresses modality .the set of modal auxiliaries in English is usually assumed to include will / would / can /could and need / dare when followed by a bare ( to - less) infinitive complement.

Morpheme The smallest unit of grammar structure. Thus, a plural noun such as cats comprises two morphemes , namely the stem cat and the plural suffix + s.

Morphology The study of how morpheme are combined together to form words.

Noun phrase A phrase whose head is a noun . Thus, the expression lovers of opera is a noun phrase , since its head is the noun lovers. In earlier work, determiners were thought to be the spcifiers of noun phrase , so that an expression such as a fan of football players would have been analysed as a noun phrase ( though in more recent work it would be analysed as an expression headed by the determiner a, and hence as a determiner phrase, DP).

Null subject A subject which has grammatical / semantic properties but no overt phonetic form. More specifically, this term usually denotes the null pro subject found in finite declarative or interrogative in other languages. Accordingly, a null subject language is a language which allows finite declarative or interrogative clauses to have a null pro subject. The null subject parameter is a dimension of variation between languages according to whether finite (declarative and interrogative) verbs allow null pro subjects.

Percolation An operation (also known as attraction) by which a feature which is attached to one category comes to be attached to another category higher up in the structure.

Performance A term which denotes observed language behaviour, e.g. the kind of things people actually say when they speak a language, and what meanings they assign to sentences produced by themselves or other people. Performance can be impaired by factors such as tiredness, drunkenness, etc. Performance is contrasted with competence (which denotes the fluent native speakers' knowledge of the grammar of their native language).

Phrase The term phrase is used to denote an expres­sion larger than a word which is a maximal projec­tion: see projection. In traditional grammar, the term refers strictly to nonclausal expressions (hence, reading a book is a phrase, but He is reading a book is a clause, not a phrase). However, in more recent work, clauses are analysed as types of phrases: e.g. He will resign is an auxiliary phrase (IP), and That he will resign is a complementizer phrase (CP).

Projection A projection is a constituent which is an expansion of a head word. For example, e noun phrase such as students of linguistics is a projection of its head noun students (equivalently, we can say that the noun students here projects into the noun phrase students of linguistics). A minimal projection is a constituent which is not a projection of some other constituent: hence, heads (i.e. words) are minimal projections. An intermediate projection is a constituent which is larger then a word, but smaller than a phrase. A maximal projection is a constituent which is not contained within any larger constituent with the same head. So, for example, in e sentence like He is proud of you, the adjectival phrase proud of you is a maximal projection, since it is a projec­tion of the adjective proud but is not contained with­in any larger projection of the same adjective proud. By contrast, in a sentence such as He la proud, the adjective proud is both a minimal projection (by virtue of the fact that it is not a projection of some other head) and a maximal projection (by virtue of the fact that it is not contained within any larger structure which has the same head adjective).

Raising (predicate) The term raising is used in two senses. On the one hand, it is used in a general sense to denote any movement operation which involves moving some word or phase from a lower to a high­er position in a structure. On the other hand, it can also be used with the more specific sense of a subject-to-subject raising operation by which an expression is moved from one subject position to another (eg. From being the subject of VP to being the subject of IP).

Specifier-features Features which determine the kind of a specifier which e given type of head can have. For example, the specifier-features of the auxiliary has ere [3SNom], and these tell us that it requires a third person singular nominative subject like he/she/it.

Tree diagram A way of representing the syntactic structure of a phrase or sentence.

6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Radford Andrew (1997): a syntax: A Minimalist Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

2. Ouhalla, Jamal 1999 (1994). Introducing Transformational Grammar, From Principles and Parameters to Minimalism, London: Arnold.

3. Task R. (1993): A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.

4. The summaries provided in class.

CONTENTS

  • Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 1

  • The Sentence: definition of this grammatical concept with its main

  • and general characteristics from different points of view ……………….… 2

  • Conventions to be used in the analysis of a sentence,

  • the constituents and its levels ………………………………………………………………….

  • Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

  • 5. Glossary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

  • Bibliography ………….

  • S

    NP AUX V AP PP

    D N ADV A P NP

    D N

    S

    NP VP

    D N V AP PP

    ADV A

    P NP

    D N

    S

    NP M VP